Right Wing Dog

The FIGHT for The RIGHT!

Obama and Holder are Bringing the 9/11 Terrorists to NYC for Trial in Our Federal Court System and Having The SAME RIGHTS as We Citizens Have!!!

As you know by now, Obama and Holder are planning on bringing the 9/11 masterminds to
NYC for trial. There is a massive grassroots movement to block this – retired members of the FDNY, theBravest.com, have partnered with 9/11 Families for a Safe & Strong and America and Keep America Safe to bring attention to this travesty. They are recruiting the families & friends of the FDNY to combat this ill-conceived policy of the current administration. They are asking that all of America join in with them by signing their petition at the following link:

http://www.thebravest.com/fdny.htm

over the past 48 hours, 60,000 people have signed the petition. l heard the founder of thebravest.com on a NYC talk show tonight – he was in the WTC when it was hit, he is passionate about this, he is ready to go to the wall over this – he needs us to stand with him.

Pass this on to all your friends and ask them to also sign the petion and send it on to their friends.

Thanx

RWD

November 14, 2009 Posted by | 2010 elections, 2012 Elections, 9/11, America, Blogroll, Democrat, NOBAMA, Political, POLITICS, President | , , , , | Leave a comment

Chris Matthews feels “SOMETHING RUNNING DOWN” his leg!

You have all heard that the  obnoxious, fawning, Barack Obama loving news talker, Chris Matthews, host of the MSNBC program Hardball, told his staff on Wednesday night that he would not run for the Senate in 2010 from Pennsylvania.  Matthews had been considering entering the Senate race as a Democrat (now that is a news flash) in his home state at the same time he was renegotiating his contract with NBC News. He had attended several meetings that had included Pennsylvania representatives as well as some major fund-raisers in the Democratic Party.

The story on the street is that MSNBC made him a salary offer he couldn’t refuse to stay on and do his gushing coverage of “the Messiah” but I think the REAL STORY is that he got cold feet and the Pennsylvania Democratic honchos told him that “he just ain’t pretty enough” to beat old Arlen Spector in the election or raise anywhere near enough money from legitimate donors to try.

Now, I want you to realize that I am not a fan of Spector (RINO that he is) but at least he sits on the RIGHT side of the aisle. Obama lover, Matthews would probably have turned out to be a camera hog, the likes not seen since Jesse Jackson Sr or Al Sharpton anyway.

See Sarah, there IS a Santa Claus!

RWD

January 9, 2009 Posted by | Blogroll, Democrat, Liberal Democrat, Main Stream Media, Obama, Political | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Support the Veterans and Contact YOUR Government

The following site is an important site to bookmark and use. There are links to get you direct information on contact for all your local,  state and Federal Representatives from the President on down. Use them to ask that they specifically keep our military in the forefront and give them the proper support they deserve as well as for writing about other things or seeing how they voted on a particular bill. Keep them informed and stay informed:

Click on this URL to take action now

http://www.capwiz.com/vetsforfreedom/home/

RWD

February 22, 2008 Posted by | Blogroll, Congress, Democrat, election, House, Liberal Democrat, Military, Murtha, News Site, pelosi, Political, POLITICS, President, Presidential Candidate, Republican, RIGHTWINGDOG, Veterans, Voting, War | , , | Leave a comment

Nancy Pelosi just can’t get it right! Last in a series

Ms. Pelosi just can’t seem to get it straight!This is the third and last article in my series on the first year anniversary of the Democratic (read Liberal) control of the House of Representatives lead by none other than The Queen, Nancy Pelosi!The question she was asked was: “What will Congress do to fix healthcare? This is a big topic on everyone’s agenda.The answer was typical Pelosi! “We sent the SCHIP Bill (State Children’s Health Insurance Program) to the President and HE vetoed it. It would have provided health insurance to 10 million more children”.What Ms. Pelosi forgot to mention was that the President vetoed the SCHIP Bill because:

·         There were no safeguards that YOUR tax money wouldn’t be spent on ineligible people

·         There were no limitations that illegal aliens or even ADULTS would benefit from SCHIP

·         The bill contained an additional funding mandate for $35 million more over five years

·         The bill also mandated adding four to six million more children in the next five yearsPresident Bush countered with a proposal to add $5 billion in funding and add 800,000 ELIGIBLE children to the program.

The Democrats (read Liberal’s) wanted absolutely nothing to do with his compromise. They wanted it their way or no way! They will try again to get this passed after the November 2008 elections. You may wonder WHY they are so adamant in passing a giveaway bill like the one they proposed. The reason is that IF they covered more people who were not eligible in the first place (such as illegal’s or those working with income levels greater than allowed? they would have more voters to help keep them in office.

As an aside to the above but still, I believe pertinent, I offer the following:

Does anyone recall the “relaxed” immigration rules that were ordered by the Clinton administration prior to the election for Bill Clinton’s second term? This is when the waiting times were shortened and the background checks were dispensed with and the United States got undesirables (including the worst possible criminal types) with no jobs and large families that ended up on welfare rolls and Bill Clinton got elected! Who paid for all of this? It wasn’t Hillary, it wasn’t Bill, IT WAS YOU! 

 RWD

January 26, 2008 Posted by | 2008 Election, Blogroll, Bush, Clinton, Congress, Democrat, Hillary, House, Liberal Democrat, pelosi, Political, POLITICS, President, RIGHTWINGDOG | , , , , | 1 Comment

Nanacy Pelosi on HER first year as Speaker of The House, The 2nd in Series

Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives

One Year in Charge of Congress

 

In speaking about the first year of the Democrats in control of Congress, Nancy Pelosi who was chosen Speaker of The House of Representatives answered some questions about the happenings in her initial year in office. This is the second in a series where the answers to the questions are hers and the comments are mine.

She was asked about the infighting in the last year between the Republicans and Democrats in Congress and if she felt that is why there was such a Congressional “deadlock”. Can the two parties get along?

Her answer was “that almost 75% on the Democrat agenda in the House was passed with broad bipartisan support. It’s critical to outline where the differences are, but I live by the adage that we will find common ground where we can and we will stand our ground where we cannot”. (In other words, THEY will not cooperate but expect the Republicans to consent to do so)

The agenda that the Democrats publicized when elected would be passed in the first 100 hours has not for the most part come to fruition. First, let me say that the “first 100 hours” is NOT 100 hours as you and I know it, it is 100 Congressional hours or probably 3 or 4 weeks.

One of the big- issues was pay as you go spending or if you spent money it was to be offset with a similar spending cut. Earmarks were to go away. In reality the earmarks have not gone away and possibly they have increased in number and dollar amount. In a previous article I noted that Hillary Clinton was the earmark queen with $500 million worth requested at year end 2007. Some of the most flagrant abusers of earmarks according to Concerned Citizens Against Government Waste are current Presidential candidates such as Biden, Clinton, Dodd, Kucinich and even Edwards when he was a Senator. 

In Pelosi’s own House of Representatives, CCAGW has labeled the following 8 Democrats as “Porkers” in 2007: Peterson, Minn., Farr, Ca. Murtha, Pa., Baucus, Mont., Feinstein, Ca., Oberstar, Minn., Clyburn, S.C., and Lincoln, Ark. There were 2 Republicans named and 2 House Subcommittees as well. CCAGW defines their label of “Porker” as one who willfully neglects proper use of tax monies and sheer arrogance of their conduct. I guess this is evidence that Nancy Pelosi’s “pay as you go” policy and her elimination of earmarks mean absolutely nothing when it comes to application by fellow Democrats.

Of the 75% of the Democratic agenda bills that she claimed were passed with “broad bi-partisan support”, many were changed or diluted so the Republicans would vote for them. Then they went to the Senate where the Democrats did not have the 60 votes needed to pass a bill in most cases. Here they were again modified and if passed sent to the President who, in many cases either simply did not sign the bill or he vetoed it. I would ask the question of Ms. Pelosi; Of the 75% of the bills that you claim passed with “broad bi-partisan support”, how many ACTUALLY became law?

RWD

January 23, 2008 Posted by | 2008 Election, Blogroll, Congress, Democrat, Edwards, election, House, Liberal Blog, Liberal Democrat, pelosi, Political, POLITICS, Republican, RIGHTWINGDOG | , , | 1 Comment