Right Wing Dog

The FIGHT for The RIGHT!

Why Obama is really “NOBAMA”!

Here is the proof! It comes from the left leaning MSNBC program “The Raw Story” The information shown below is on all three Presidential candidates.

McCain’s lifetime attendance record is fairly solid — he’s missed 11 percent of votes since 1987 — and he’s nowhere near as missing from the Senate as Sen. John Kerry four years ago, when he missed 72 percent of votes in 2003-04 alone, says the New York Times. Clinton has missed 27 percent of Senate votes, while “NObama” missed 37 percent of Senate votes.

It seems the Democratic candiates have missed the most votes by far. One thing that is NOT STATED above is that in McCain’s 31 years in the Senate and only missing 11 percent of the votes for that period, he ran a campaign for President back in 2000 just as he is now. “NObama” who has only been a Senator of 3 years has more than tripled the amount of missed votes in the Senate over John McCain and more than doubled those missed votes of Hillary Clinton.

Maybe “Nobama” looks toward John Kerry, who lost his only bid for the Presidency, as an idol figure?

Does “NObama” only cast votes for the bills HE is interested in or worse, only for those that are not controversial in nature?

Was he too busy traveling or possibly it was more important that he write a book or two!

I think the voters (especially Illinois residents who he allegedly is representing) have a RIGHT to know and that he has an obligation to tell us with specifics!

RWD

March 31, 2008 Posted by | 2008 Election, Blogroll, Democrat, Kerry, Liberal Democrat, McCain, New Yrok Times, NOBAMA, Obama, Political, POLITICS, President, Presidential Candidate, RIGHTWINGDOG, Senator, Voting | , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Democratic Political Venom

The following is  a paragraph from today’s NYT online. It is part of a comment from Senator Patrick Leahy who has called for Hillary Clinton to resign and resume a remarkable career in the Senate:

“I am very concerned. John McCain, who has been making one gaffe after another, is getting a free ride on it, because Senator Obama and Senator Clinton have to fight with each other. I think that her criticism is hurting him more than anything John McCain has said.”

He, Leahy, is attempting by streching the truth beyond its limits, to demean Senator McClain for his recent mixing up of the Sunni’s and the Shiites in a speech. Leahy going far and away from the facts when he says ” McCain has been making one gaffe after another”. What the hell does he call the lies of Obama and Clinton? How does he explain Obama, who ius his chosen candidate, condoning a Preacher damning America, blaming the U.S.A. for 9/11, his remarks about Italians and Jews? How does he rationalize Obama’s no votes in the Senate both the U.S. Senate and the Illinois Senate before that? Thius man is an embarrassment to the voters of Vermont who blindly keep electing him to the Senate. Maybe they will wake up.

RWD

March 29, 2008 Posted by | 2008 Election, 9/11, Blogroll, Clinton, Democrat, election, Hillary, Jeremiah Wright, Liberal Democrat, McCain, Obama, Political, POLITICS, President, Presidential Candidate, Senator, Uncategorized | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

It’s McCain or We Slide Down the Liberal Slide to Ruin!!!

However, if those whose oppose this choice vote OTHER than McCain OR don’t vote President at all, it is them we blame for the liberal morons who will control Washington, the increased taxes and outlandish give-away programs, the crumble of the middle east and the resultant shortages of oil. It is them we will blame for the influx of illegals crossing our borders and sucking our public assistence and social ecurity dollars dry.

It is them we can blame for foreign affairs policies that make other countries laugh at us behind our backs and take advantage of us to our face. It is them we will blame for those who would take our money and use it for anti-American campaigns.

It is them we blame for mandatory sub-standard healthcare and liberal teachers who are only interested in furthering liberalism and collecting their payroll checks and it is them we blame for the burgeoning number of government workers who know nothing, do nothing and are nothing.

I hope the voters who choose this type of vote are ready and willing to shoulder the consequences of that vote!

RWD

I am a supporter of McCain for President

February 18, 2008 Posted by | 2008 Election, America, Blogroll, Clinton, Conservative, Democrat, election, Hillary, immigration, Liberal Democrat, McCain, Obama, Political, POLITICS, President, Presidential Candidate, RIGHTWINGDOG, Senator, Social Security, Terrorism, Voting, War | , , , , , , | 2 Comments

FISA approved by Senate – Bomb to Democrats

Yesterday the Senate voted to expand the authority of the Government spy/wiretap program for up to the next six years by a HUGE vote of 68 to 29. This is a BIG VICTORY for PRESIDENT BUSH and A STUNNING DEFEAT FOR THE DEMOCRATS.

John McCain voted in favor of the legislation while, curiously to me, Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama did not even vote but each issued a statement later that they opposed the final outcome. In review of the other Senators that from each state Clinton and Obama represent (Durbin D-Il and Schumer D-NY) they both voted against the measure.

Former Democratic Presidential candidates Russ Feingold and Chris Dodd both has been outspoken in their opposition to the bill and of course voted against it.

President Bush has asked the House of Representatives to follow the Senates lead and quickly approve the legislation. The current allowance for this form of protection for our country from the terrorists who want us dead is due to expire Saturday of this week.

I urge you to contact your Congress persons and voice your wishes that this bill be approved and sent to the President without change or delay as soon as possible. The fate of the Country could be in your hands! 

RWD

February 14, 2008 Posted by | 9/11, America, Blogroll, Bush, Clinton, Congress, Democrat, Durbin, Hillary, Illinois, Islam, Obama, Political, POLITICS, President, Presidential Candidate, Republican, Senator, War | , , , , , | 5 Comments

Nancy Pelosi just can’t get it right! Last in a series

Ms. Pelosi just can’t seem to get it straight!This is the third and last article in my series on the first year anniversary of the Democratic (read Liberal) control of the House of Representatives lead by none other than The Queen, Nancy Pelosi!The question she was asked was: “What will Congress do to fix healthcare? This is a big topic on everyone’s agenda.The answer was typical Pelosi! “We sent the SCHIP Bill (State Children’s Health Insurance Program) to the President and HE vetoed it. It would have provided health insurance to 10 million more children”.What Ms. Pelosi forgot to mention was that the President vetoed the SCHIP Bill because:

·         There were no safeguards that YOUR tax money wouldn’t be spent on ineligible people

·         There were no limitations that illegal aliens or even ADULTS would benefit from SCHIP

·         The bill contained an additional funding mandate for $35 million more over five years

·         The bill also mandated adding four to six million more children in the next five yearsPresident Bush countered with a proposal to add $5 billion in funding and add 800,000 ELIGIBLE children to the program.

The Democrats (read Liberal’s) wanted absolutely nothing to do with his compromise. They wanted it their way or no way! They will try again to get this passed after the November 2008 elections. You may wonder WHY they are so adamant in passing a giveaway bill like the one they proposed. The reason is that IF they covered more people who were not eligible in the first place (such as illegal’s or those working with income levels greater than allowed? they would have more voters to help keep them in office.

As an aside to the above but still, I believe pertinent, I offer the following:

Does anyone recall the “relaxed” immigration rules that were ordered by the Clinton administration prior to the election for Bill Clinton’s second term? This is when the waiting times were shortened and the background checks were dispensed with and the United States got undesirables (including the worst possible criminal types) with no jobs and large families that ended up on welfare rolls and Bill Clinton got elected! Who paid for all of this? It wasn’t Hillary, it wasn’t Bill, IT WAS YOU! 

 RWD

January 26, 2008 Posted by | 2008 Election, Blogroll, Bush, Clinton, Congress, Democrat, Hillary, House, Liberal Democrat, pelosi, Political, POLITICS, President, RIGHTWINGDOG | , , , , | 1 Comment

Start your Day in A Better Way!

HOW TO START EACH DAY WITH A POSITIVE OUTLOOK 
 
1. Open a new file in your computer. 
 
2. Name it ‘Hillary Rodham Clinton’ 
 
3. Send it to the Recycle Bin. 
 
4. Empty the Recycle Bin. 
 
5. Your PC will ask you. ‘Do you really want to get rid of ‘Hillary Rodham Clinton ?’ 
 
6 Firmly Click ‘Yes.’ 
 
7. Feel better. 
 
PS – Tomorrow we’ll do Nancy Pelosi
 

I feel better already!

January 17, 2008 Posted by | 2008 Election, Blogroll, Clinton, Hillary, Humor, Liberal Democrat, pelosi, Political, POLITICS, President, Presidential Candidate, RIGHTWINGDOG, Senator | , , , | 3 Comments

“Loose” Change!

When you take a close look at the current race for President and concentrate on the Democratic Party candidates they ALL are talking about CHANGE as the base for their platform. If I am not mistaken Senator Barack Obama is the candidate who started the idea of making CHANGE as a campaign slogan and the others picked up on it due to them thinking that was part of the cause for Obama’s celebrity. The problem is they all advocate CHANGE but aside from saying they are for a CHANGE in leadership in Washington (isn’t that what the election is all about anyway?) they don’t expand on much else. Obama’s campaign slogan is “CHANGE we can believe in”. Clinton says “I believe in CHANGE”. Edwards, in a campaign speech recently is quoted as saying “Obama believes deeply in CHANGE and I believe deeply in CHANGE” (sounds like his looking for spot #2 on Obama’s ticket to me). The rest of the candidates should make a great CHANGE and get off trying to win the nomination as they have as much chance of winning as Jesse Jackson did when he ran in 1988!What form of CHANGE then are they talking about? One can only guess that is must have to do with some of the programs they have bandied about in their stump speeches and the propaganda their staff hands out to gullible voters. They want to CHANGE the war on terrorism (some candidates say there is no terrorism so why wage war on something that is not there). Some are talking about a CHANGE in immigration laws to make it easier to gain citizenship and others are going to make a CHANGE so everyone has healthcare and on and on it goes. The only thing I can see happening with the CHANGES I have mentioned as well as the others I have not is that they cost money. Money the government does not have. So, where will the money come from? I will tell you: they will borrow it and then they will raise our taxes in order to pay back the debt and then we will have only LOOSE CHANGE left in our pockets to spend after we get our paychecks!

I see absolutely no CHANGE here at all. It is the usual tax and spend policy of the left.

RWD

January 16, 2008 Posted by | 2008 Election, Blogroll, Change, Clinton, Congress, Conservative, Democrat, Edwards, election, Hillary, huckabee, Kerry, Kucinich, Liberal Democrat, Obama, Political, POLITICS, President, Presidential Candidate, Republican, RIGHTWINGDOG, Senator, Ted Kennedy, Voting | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

It Appears Huckabee Aint’ so Hot!

The following is an excerpt from Real Clear Politics showing the amoung Net people, Huckabee just ain’t makin’ it! I would urge you to go to http://www.realclearpolitics.com and check out the complete story and a great site.

“So, how do we evaluate the contrast between Huckabee’s rise in national polls versus his lackluster reception in the righty blogosphere?

RCP.jpg

Real Clear Politics’ John McIntyre says Huckabee has benefited because: “I suspect the voters have been very much turned off by the recent nastiness between Giuliani and Romney.”

Sounds a lot like this morning’s post on how John Edwards is potentially benefiting from the Obama-Clinton cage match.”

RWD

December 8, 2007 Posted by | America, Blogroll, Clinton, Conservative, Democrat, Edwards, Hillary, huckabee, Liberal Blog, Liberal Democrat, Obama, Political, POLITICS, President, Presidential Candidate, Republican, Ron Paul, Uncategorized, Voting | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Respect for the Office of President!

I ran across this column in a syndicated newspaper today and I was so impressed with the writing at the content I had to send it to as many people as possible. I emailed the author for permission to put it on my BLOGS. He said it would be OK. It will also appear on my other blogs as well. I hope you are as impressed as I was.    

Respect for the Office of President

To my memory, it began in earnest on August 9th, 1974. That was the day President Richard Nixon ascended the stairs of the government helicopter parked on the White House lawn and was shuttled off to private life. It is one of those iconographic images: the president–both arms extended in his signature victory salute.

Yet is was no victory, the American president had become chum in the shark infested waters of the national media, and we the citizenry had developed an insatiable taste for blood.    

Some 27 years later a scandal of a more intimate nature followed President Clinton from office, and as we gear up for another presidential election I am left with a lingering question from the Clinton era:  How is it that anyone, male of female, gained unrestricted, unmonitored access to the leader of the Western world within the confines of the oval office? Along with the obvious moral failure, there was an even greater security failure, a shot fired not across the bow of the American Presidency, but clear through the walls of the oval office.   

It is my view that the Office of the American President is ultimately more important than who may occupy the seat of the president at any given time. And further that the protection of that office is one of the most vital security functions of our nation. It is not coincidental that while we were obsessing over the details of the Clinton debacle, our current shadowy enemy was engaging in their strategic plan to bring the war and indeed the rest of the world to our doorstep.   

To restore and protect the integrity of the Office of the American President requires that our citizens accept that we do not have an inalienable right to know all there is to know about the president.  We need to relinquish our desire to know every misstep, every indiscretion, every flubbed line in a speech. That our need to know ends where our national security begins.   

Our current field of primary candidates should realize that the Office they seek to occupy is more important than any of them will ever be: That the place to which they desire to ascend is sacred American space and the epicenter of American power and will.   

All I ask of any president is that she or he be a person of integrity with a working knowledge of the world.  That they love the United States, and are willing to subjugate their own political aspirations for the sake of the office of which they are stewards.  

I want to know that the windows of the oval office are still blast-proof; that the red telephone still works. That the anti-aircraft installation on the roof is at the ready, and that Air force One is standing by. The Office of the American Presidency is to be both revered and feared by friend and foe around the globe. 

 Evan Goranson

RWD       

December 7, 2007 Posted by | 2008 Election, Blogroll, Bush, Clinton, Conservative, Democrat, Hillary, Liberal Blog, Liberal Democrat, Nixon, Political, POLITICS, President, Republican, Terrorism | , , , , | 3 Comments

Maybe “part” of LIBERAL HOLLYWOOD is waking up!

Here are two seperate section taken from NEWSMAX that are important in that they say volumes about the way a BIG START feels about the liberal CRAP coming out of Hollywood and the way the movie going public feels about ANTI-WAR MOVIES that even Vatiety lables “BACKBENDING LIBERAL“!

Robert Redford acted like a politician when asked about the current presidential campaign during a recent interview with the Chicago Sun Times. In an era in which Hollywood stars toss out endorsements of Democratic candidates as easily as they give out advice on international diplomacy, Redford snubbed the Democrat presidential hopefuls — all of them. The guy who once starred in “The Candidate” and “All the President’s Men” said that he may be engaged in the current political scene but “engagement is different than backing a candidate when you don’t think there’s anybody out there.” When the liberal Sundance Kid publicly states that he doesn’t think “there’s anybody out there,” he’s blowing Hollywood air disses at Hillary, Obama, Edwards, and even E.T.’s bud Dennis Kucinich. Tom Cruise’s “Lions for Lambs,” which Variety labeled “backbendingly liberal,” tanked, taking in a meager $6.5 million despite its additional big-name stars Robert Redford and Meryl Streep. The anti-war movie directed by Redford placed fourth in box-office revenue and was savaged by critics, achieving a miserable 27 percent rating on the Rotten Tomatoes site.

When Hollywood tries to influence American opinions, sometimes they fin d out that IT’S NOT NICE TO FOOL WITH AMERICAN VALUES!

RWD

November 13, 2007 Posted by | 2008 Election, America, Blogroll, Democrat, Hillary, Hollywood, Liberal Blog, Liberal Democrat, Obama, Political, POLITICS, Presidential Candidate, Senator, Voting, War | , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments