Right Wing Dog

The FIGHT for The RIGHT!

Barack Obama’s Cabinet is full of People Getting On The Job Training! Is that Scary or What?

If you examine the prior private sector experience of the cabinet officials since 1900 that one might expect a president to turn to in seeking advice about helping the economy. It includes secretaries of State, Commerce, Treasury, Agriculture, Interior, Labor, Transportation, Energy, and Housing & Urban Development, and excludes Postmaster General, Navy, War, Health, Education & Welfare, Veterans Affairs, and Homeland Security—432 cabinet members in all.
When you examine the cabinet positions that Barack Hussein Obama has made, only about SEVEN PER CENT HAVE HAD ANY PRIOR PRIVATE SECTOR EXPERIENCE IN WHAT THEY DO, so says an analysist at J.P. Morgan.

The Presidents with appointments of members with the MOST experience before Washington were; Eisenhower – 59%, Reagan – 58%, George H.W. Bush – 52% and George W. Bush – 52%! Strangely enough they were ALL Republicans! Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

Kennedy – 28% and Obama – 7-% were the lowest!
Is this scary or what?

Where does this appear in the Main Stream Media – T.V., Newspapers, Magazines ETC??
This graph for this showing all Presidents since 1900 can be found at: http://blog.american.com/?p=7572

RWD

Advertisements

November 30, 2009 Posted by | 2008 Election, 2010 elections, 2012 Elections, America, Blogroll, Carol Browner, Clinton, Congress, Conservative, Democrat, Durbin, election, Energy, Healthcare, Hilda Solis, Hillary, House, huckabee, Joe Biden, Liberal Democrat, Main Stream Media, Michelle Obama, News Site, NOBAMA, Obama, Political, POLITICS, President, Presidential Candidate, Roland Burris, Senator, Social Security, Socialist, Terrorism, Unconstitutional, unions, Veterans, Vice President, White House | , , , | Leave a comment

“Loose” Change!

When you take a close look at the current race for President and concentrate on the Democratic Party candidates they ALL are talking about CHANGE as the base for their platform. If I am not mistaken Senator Barack Obama is the candidate who started the idea of making CHANGE as a campaign slogan and the others picked up on it due to them thinking that was part of the cause for Obama’s celebrity. The problem is they all advocate CHANGE but aside from saying they are for a CHANGE in leadership in Washington (isn’t that what the election is all about anyway?) they don’t expand on much else. Obama’s campaign slogan is “CHANGE we can believe in”. Clinton says “I believe in CHANGE”. Edwards, in a campaign speech recently is quoted as saying “Obama believes deeply in CHANGE and I believe deeply in CHANGE” (sounds like his looking for spot #2 on Obama’s ticket to me). The rest of the candidates should make a great CHANGE and get off trying to win the nomination as they have as much chance of winning as Jesse Jackson did when he ran in 1988!What form of CHANGE then are they talking about? One can only guess that is must have to do with some of the programs they have bandied about in their stump speeches and the propaganda their staff hands out to gullible voters. They want to CHANGE the war on terrorism (some candidates say there is no terrorism so why wage war on something that is not there). Some are talking about a CHANGE in immigration laws to make it easier to gain citizenship and others are going to make a CHANGE so everyone has healthcare and on and on it goes. The only thing I can see happening with the CHANGES I have mentioned as well as the others I have not is that they cost money. Money the government does not have. So, where will the money come from? I will tell you: they will borrow it and then they will raise our taxes in order to pay back the debt and then we will have only LOOSE CHANGE left in our pockets to spend after we get our paychecks!

I see absolutely no CHANGE here at all. It is the usual tax and spend policy of the left.

RWD

January 16, 2008 Posted by | 2008 Election, Blogroll, Change, Clinton, Congress, Conservative, Democrat, Edwards, election, Hillary, huckabee, Kerry, Kucinich, Liberal Democrat, Obama, Political, POLITICS, President, Presidential Candidate, Republican, RIGHTWINGDOG, Senator, Ted Kennedy, Voting | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Barack Obama’s Gang of Four!

If this isn’t just like those who foment the liberal philosophy, they blame their own shortcomings on someone else instead of looking toward themselves as a reason for their problem/defeat. 

 There was an article posted at NewsMax http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/John_Kerry_and_his
_Anti-H/2008/01/10/63282.html
about the “Gang of Four” all endorsing Obama because of their all consuming hatred for Hillary and Bill Clinton.  It would seem to me that they would state some issue that Obama has as a reason for the endorsement to offset the REAL reason that I previously mentioned.  

This act of complete disregard for intelligent thought (what am I saying, I am talking about Kennedy, Bore, Kerry and Dean and I reference intelligence??) is possibly in all reality giving Hillary an indirect boost because there are many of those who have less than undying admiration for those who make up the “the gang of Four”.  

I can’t help but figure this was expected by Hillary’s people and should she be elected (oh my God, there I go again, must be something I ate) SHE will get HER revenge! Count on it!

Incidentally, “THe Gang of Four should really be called “The Useless Gang of Four”.

RWD

January 11, 2008 Posted by | 2008 Election, Al Gore, commentaries, Conservative, Democrat, election, Hillary, huckabee, Kerry, Liberal Democrat, Obama, Political, POLITICS, Presidential Candidate, Senator | , , , , , | Leave a comment

This is for all of you OBAMA BOMBERS and HUCKABEE HOUNDS!!

When I look at the results and read the articles in the news, listen to the commentators and the candidates themselves, I am solidly reminded of the cliché “It ain’t over till the fat lady sings”. While that refers to an opera, it is apropos for an election, especially one as unusual as Election 2008! There are 305 days until November 4, 2008 – the BIG election! The last poll! The big enchilada! The day after that is the day we can say who won. Iowa is NOT indicative of the outcome. It does just both candidates a BOOST for New Hampshire on the 8th but it does not say OBAMA will won in November. It does not say HUCKABEE will win in November.One thing that Iowa being over does do is tells the “also rans” like Dodd, Kucinich, Gravel, Paul, Thompson, McCain and Hunter that they may be finished and gives them the opportunity to urge their supporters to turn support to one of the leaders. This is big but not huge as there is no mandate that the supporters follow the advice.

So all you Obama Bombers and Huckabee Hounds, remember the cliché “It ain’t over until the fat lady sings” and she don’t sing until November 4th!

RWD

January 5, 2008 Posted by | 2008 Election, Clinton, Democrat, Edwards, election, huckabee, Kucinich, Liberal Democrat, Obama, Political, POLITICS, President, Presidential Candidate, Republican, Ron Paul | , , , | Leave a comment

It Appears Huckabee Aint’ so Hot!

The following is an excerpt from Real Clear Politics showing the amoung Net people, Huckabee just ain’t makin’ it! I would urge you to go to http://www.realclearpolitics.com and check out the complete story and a great site.

“So, how do we evaluate the contrast between Huckabee’s rise in national polls versus his lackluster reception in the righty blogosphere?

RCP.jpg

Real Clear Politics’ John McIntyre says Huckabee has benefited because: “I suspect the voters have been very much turned off by the recent nastiness between Giuliani and Romney.”

Sounds a lot like this morning’s post on how John Edwards is potentially benefiting from the Obama-Clinton cage match.”

RWD

December 8, 2007 Posted by | America, Blogroll, Clinton, Conservative, Democrat, Edwards, Hillary, huckabee, Liberal Blog, Liberal Democrat, Obama, Political, POLITICS, President, Presidential Candidate, Republican, Ron Paul, Uncategorized, Voting | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment