Right Wing Dog

The FIGHT for The RIGHT!

Ode To Hillary – – It’s The Presidency to which you aspire !

Liar, Liar pants on fire

It’s your lies of which we tire.

You didn’t put your head down, you weren’t under fire

Your dishonesty has put you in the mire. 

From this fiasco, let’s see you squeeze

You usually manage to slip out with ease.

The damage to your campaign is done

This time Bill wasn’t the one. 

Sinbad says that he don’t lie

He says your stories just don’t fly.

Your head wasn’t down; it was in your ass

This time the media gives you no pass. 

The time has come when we have to say

Hillary, Hillary please go away.

RightWingDog

March 27, 2008 Posted by | 2008 Election, Blogroll, Clinton, Democrat, election, Hillary, Liberal Democrat, Political, POLITICS, President, Presidential Candidate, Senator | , , , , , | 1 Comment

It’s McCain or We Slide Down the Liberal Slide to Ruin!!!

However, if those whose oppose this choice vote OTHER than McCain OR don’t vote President at all, it is them we blame for the liberal morons who will control Washington, the increased taxes and outlandish give-away programs, the crumble of the middle east and the resultant shortages of oil. It is them we will blame for the influx of illegals crossing our borders and sucking our public assistence and social ecurity dollars dry.

It is them we can blame for foreign affairs policies that make other countries laugh at us behind our backs and take advantage of us to our face. It is them we will blame for those who would take our money and use it for anti-American campaigns.

It is them we blame for mandatory sub-standard healthcare and liberal teachers who are only interested in furthering liberalism and collecting their payroll checks and it is them we blame for the burgeoning number of government workers who know nothing, do nothing and are nothing.

I hope the voters who choose this type of vote are ready and willing to shoulder the consequences of that vote!

RWD

I am a supporter of McCain for President

February 18, 2008 Posted by | 2008 Election, America, Blogroll, Clinton, Conservative, Democrat, election, Hillary, immigration, Liberal Democrat, McCain, Obama, Political, POLITICS, President, Presidential Candidate, RIGHTWINGDOG, Senator, Social Security, Terrorism, Voting, War | , , , , , , | 2 Comments

FISA approved by Senate – Bomb to Democrats

Yesterday the Senate voted to expand the authority of the Government spy/wiretap program for up to the next six years by a HUGE vote of 68 to 29. This is a BIG VICTORY for PRESIDENT BUSH and A STUNNING DEFEAT FOR THE DEMOCRATS.

John McCain voted in favor of the legislation while, curiously to me, Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama did not even vote but each issued a statement later that they opposed the final outcome. In review of the other Senators that from each state Clinton and Obama represent (Durbin D-Il and Schumer D-NY) they both voted against the measure.

Former Democratic Presidential candidates Russ Feingold and Chris Dodd both has been outspoken in their opposition to the bill and of course voted against it.

President Bush has asked the House of Representatives to follow the Senates lead and quickly approve the legislation. The current allowance for this form of protection for our country from the terrorists who want us dead is due to expire Saturday of this week.

I urge you to contact your Congress persons and voice your wishes that this bill be approved and sent to the President without change or delay as soon as possible. The fate of the Country could be in your hands! 

RWD

February 14, 2008 Posted by | 9/11, America, Blogroll, Bush, Clinton, Congress, Democrat, Durbin, Hillary, Illinois, Islam, Obama, Political, POLITICS, President, Presidential Candidate, Republican, Senator, War | , , , , , | 5 Comments

Before you Vote 02/05/2008, remember these Un-American Senators-VOTE NO on Them

The following Senators voted against making English  the official language Of America :

Akaka (D-HI)
Bayh (D-IN)
Biden (D-DE) (Wanted to be President)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Clinton (D-NY) (Wants to be President)
Dayton (D-MN)
Dodd ( D- MN ) wanted to be president
Domenici (R-NM) coward. Protecting his senate seat
Durbin (D-IL) This Senator is useless and should be voted down
Feingold (D-win) – not unusual for him, wanted to be President

Feinstein (D-ca)
Harkin (D-IA)
Inouye (D-hi)
Jeffords (I-VT)
Kennedy – (D-ma) Mr. Liberal himself- aka The Swimmer
Kerry (D-ma) (tried to be president and LOST)

Kohl (D-WI)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (I-CT) Disappointment here…..
Menendez (D-NJ)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Obama (D-IL) (Wants to be President, Oh Does He!)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV) Senate Majority Leader s/b Majority LOSER
As Lazar (D-CO)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Schumer (D-NY)
Stabenow (D-M

PRESIDENT ABRAHAM LINCOLN
“Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage morale and undermine the military are saboteurs and should be arrested, exiled or Hanged!!!
RWD

February 5, 2008 Posted by | 2008 Election, Blogroll, Clinton, Democrat, Durbin, election, Hillary, Kerry, Obama, Political, POLITICS, President, Presidential Candidate, Reid, Senator, Socialist, Ted Kennedy, Voting | , , , | 3 Comments

Was South Carolina a Train Wreck for Hillary??

Train wreck in South Carolina for HillaryMaybe not! What’s the bigger story, Obama winning with 55% of the vote or the Clinton’s losing with 27% of the vote? I think Obama was expected to win BIG although none of the polls I saw had him taking her by more than 20%. A week ago the RCP composite poll only showed a 10.5% difference between the two with Obama on top. This is no doubt another shock for the pollsters and another reason why the voter should not use the polls as a guide.

Regardless of the above, I still believe the BIG story is the Clinton’s losing and here is the reason I think that way and while many are saying this is an omen of doom for the Clinton’s, I am not so sure. Before I go any further with this, I expect you have noted that I have referred to “the Clinton’s” and not Hillary Clinton in the South Carolina section. It is because husband Bill was so heavily involved in the campaign there. I also think the large spread in the votes is due to the black vote. The Clinton’s forced Obama into using the race issue. That made Obama THE black President! Then the Clinton campaign’s use of “dirty politics” galvanized the black vote for Obama and took away the black supporters the Clinton’s did have. Then again, it may have been the Clinton campaign strategy to lose South Carolina and label Obama as THE black candidate and dwell on that in the future primaries in Florida and the 22 taking place on “super Tuesday” hoping for an advantage with the white vote. Bill Clinton was quoted as saying that Jesse Jackson, when he ran in 1984 and again in 1988 won the state of South Carolina meaning that he, as a black candidate, won the black vote but it meant little in the entire picture.

Remember Carolina and Iowa does not necessarily a nominee make. Let’s take a look at all five state races thus far and how they shake out for number of votes per candidate, and what the electoral vote total is after these five contests. Primaries:

  • Clinton received 581,242 votes
  • Obama received 400,211 votes
  • Edwards received 142,394 votes
  • Uncommitted and Dropouts received 288,942 votes

Caucuses:

  • Obama received 9512 votes
  • Clinton received 9510 votes
  • Edwards received 4605 votes
  • Uncommitted and dropouts received 507 votes

Delegates:

  • Obama has 63 delegates
  • Clinton has 48 delegates
  • Edwards has 26 delegates
  • Unallocated has 37 delegates

Obama has only 15 more delegates than Clinton at this juncture and in popular vote he is behind her by 181,240 votes. There are 37 unallocated delegates that could go either way at this point. I do not see this as a losing position for the Clinton’s because there are 57 delegates to be awarded in Florida, 280 in New York, 185 in Illinois and 440 in California. It is “super Tuesday’s outcome that will most likely tell a solid story on WHO the nominee will be.

When the Democratic Convention convenes in The Pepsi Center in Denver on August 25, 2008 the candidate who has a number equal to or greater than 2025 will be the Party’s Presidential candidate. Take a look at this website after the February 5th totals are all in and it will give you and idea of where each candidate stands delegate wise.

RWD

January 28, 2008 Posted by | 2008 Election, Blogroll, Clinton, Democrat, Hillary, Investigative, Liberal Blog, Liberal Democrat, Obama, Political, POLITICS, President, Presidential Candidate, RIGHTWINGDOG, Senator, Voting | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Nancy Pelosi just can’t get it right! Last in a series

Ms. Pelosi just can’t seem to get it straight!This is the third and last article in my series on the first year anniversary of the Democratic (read Liberal) control of the House of Representatives lead by none other than The Queen, Nancy Pelosi!The question she was asked was: “What will Congress do to fix healthcare? This is a big topic on everyone’s agenda.The answer was typical Pelosi! “We sent the SCHIP Bill (State Children’s Health Insurance Program) to the President and HE vetoed it. It would have provided health insurance to 10 million more children”.What Ms. Pelosi forgot to mention was that the President vetoed the SCHIP Bill because:

·         There were no safeguards that YOUR tax money wouldn’t be spent on ineligible people

·         There were no limitations that illegal aliens or even ADULTS would benefit from SCHIP

·         The bill contained an additional funding mandate for $35 million more over five years

·         The bill also mandated adding four to six million more children in the next five yearsPresident Bush countered with a proposal to add $5 billion in funding and add 800,000 ELIGIBLE children to the program.

The Democrats (read Liberal’s) wanted absolutely nothing to do with his compromise. They wanted it their way or no way! They will try again to get this passed after the November 2008 elections. You may wonder WHY they are so adamant in passing a giveaway bill like the one they proposed. The reason is that IF they covered more people who were not eligible in the first place (such as illegal’s or those working with income levels greater than allowed? they would have more voters to help keep them in office.

As an aside to the above but still, I believe pertinent, I offer the following:

Does anyone recall the “relaxed” immigration rules that were ordered by the Clinton administration prior to the election for Bill Clinton’s second term? This is when the waiting times were shortened and the background checks were dispensed with and the United States got undesirables (including the worst possible criminal types) with no jobs and large families that ended up on welfare rolls and Bill Clinton got elected! Who paid for all of this? It wasn’t Hillary, it wasn’t Bill, IT WAS YOU! 

 RWD

January 26, 2008 Posted by | 2008 Election, Blogroll, Bush, Clinton, Congress, Democrat, Hillary, House, Liberal Democrat, pelosi, Political, POLITICS, President, RIGHTWINGDOG | , , , , | 1 Comment

Did you forget January 20, 2001? I hope not!

Does the date January 20, 2001 mean anything to you? It should! It is the date the Marc Rich received his pardon from The United States of America.

Does the name Marc Rich mean anything to you? It should! He is the man who was convicted of evading $48 million in taxes owed to the United States of America. In addition he was known to have been actively involved in a trading business with the terrorist rulers of Iran, Libya and Cuba against the express rules of The United States of America. He is an extremely wealthy man who gained his fortune by cheating, lying, stealing and fraud. He was actually on the FBI’s list of most wanted international fugitives. You see when he got in trouble here, he left for Europe and having as much money as he did, had houses all over the world. He lived in Switzerland where he could not be extradited from.How did he convince those in The United States of America to grant the pardon? It was easy, he found a person who was willing to ignore the law, who was not beyond taking money (lots of money in this case) who was known to lie incessantly, at times for no reason at all and whose entire life was almost a fraud.

I imagine that you would like to know who the person was that was ready, oh so willing and able to grant the pardon. It was President William Jefferson Clinton and he did the unspeakable deed just before leaving office.Marc Rich paid for the pardon. He contacted influential people around the world but mainly in Israel and asked for, paid for help to contact Clinton to arrange for the pardon. He saw to it that the Clinton Library received large donation. Through his ex-wife, Denise Rich, he spread even more money around the Clinton’s. Hillary’s campaign for the Senate received a large donation. Denise Rich donated furniture to the Clinton’s new house in New York. Denise Rich was rumored to have had a “special relationship” with  Bill Clinton, one of his  “women”. Those in the know said they had slept together more than once.

In a strange coincidence, the head prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s office that got the conviction against Marc Rich was none other than – Rudy Giuliani. He was dumbfounded when he heard about the pardon.

When I realized that the date had completely slipped by without any notice or comment.  I saw nothing at all in the press in the newspapers or on television; I knew I had to remind everyone of this important date in history. The day that March Rich and The Clinton’s screwed the United State of America!

To top off the egregious actions of Bill Clinton and the self-righteous attitude that Marc Rich had after receiving the pardon he bought and paid for (he had the chutzpah to claim HE was wronged and should not have been convicted) the Congress did not even look into the way in which Bill Clinton doled out parson as if he was passing out candy on Halloween.

I hope you will remember January 20, 2001 now and how Marc Ric and The Clinton’s stuck it to America.

RWD

January 22, 2008 Posted by | 2008 Election, Blogroll, Clinton, corruption, Democrat, Hillary, Investigative, Liberal Blog, Liberal Democrat, Main Stream Media, New Yrok Times, Pardon's, Political, POLITICS, President, Presidential Candidate, RIGHTWINGDOG | , , , | Leave a comment

Start your Day in A Better Way!

HOW TO START EACH DAY WITH A POSITIVE OUTLOOK 
 
1. Open a new file in your computer. 
 
2. Name it ‘Hillary Rodham Clinton’ 
 
3. Send it to the Recycle Bin. 
 
4. Empty the Recycle Bin. 
 
5. Your PC will ask you. ‘Do you really want to get rid of ‘Hillary Rodham Clinton ?’ 
 
6 Firmly Click ‘Yes.’ 
 
7. Feel better. 
 
PS – Tomorrow we’ll do Nancy Pelosi
 

I feel better already!

January 17, 2008 Posted by | 2008 Election, Blogroll, Clinton, Hillary, Humor, Liberal Democrat, pelosi, Political, POLITICS, President, Presidential Candidate, RIGHTWINGDOG, Senator | , , , | 3 Comments

“Loose” Change!

When you take a close look at the current race for President and concentrate on the Democratic Party candidates they ALL are talking about CHANGE as the base for their platform. If I am not mistaken Senator Barack Obama is the candidate who started the idea of making CHANGE as a campaign slogan and the others picked up on it due to them thinking that was part of the cause for Obama’s celebrity. The problem is they all advocate CHANGE but aside from saying they are for a CHANGE in leadership in Washington (isn’t that what the election is all about anyway?) they don’t expand on much else. Obama’s campaign slogan is “CHANGE we can believe in”. Clinton says “I believe in CHANGE”. Edwards, in a campaign speech recently is quoted as saying “Obama believes deeply in CHANGE and I believe deeply in CHANGE” (sounds like his looking for spot #2 on Obama’s ticket to me). The rest of the candidates should make a great CHANGE and get off trying to win the nomination as they have as much chance of winning as Jesse Jackson did when he ran in 1988!What form of CHANGE then are they talking about? One can only guess that is must have to do with some of the programs they have bandied about in their stump speeches and the propaganda their staff hands out to gullible voters. They want to CHANGE the war on terrorism (some candidates say there is no terrorism so why wage war on something that is not there). Some are talking about a CHANGE in immigration laws to make it easier to gain citizenship and others are going to make a CHANGE so everyone has healthcare and on and on it goes. The only thing I can see happening with the CHANGES I have mentioned as well as the others I have not is that they cost money. Money the government does not have. So, where will the money come from? I will tell you: they will borrow it and then they will raise our taxes in order to pay back the debt and then we will have only LOOSE CHANGE left in our pockets to spend after we get our paychecks!

I see absolutely no CHANGE here at all. It is the usual tax and spend policy of the left.

RWD

January 16, 2008 Posted by | 2008 Election, Blogroll, Change, Clinton, Congress, Conservative, Democrat, Edwards, election, Hillary, huckabee, Kerry, Kucinich, Liberal Democrat, Obama, Political, POLITICS, President, Presidential Candidate, Republican, RIGHTWINGDOG, Senator, Ted Kennedy, Voting | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Barack Obama’s Gang of Four!

If this isn’t just like those who foment the liberal philosophy, they blame their own shortcomings on someone else instead of looking toward themselves as a reason for their problem/defeat. 

 There was an article posted at NewsMax http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/John_Kerry_and_his
_Anti-H/2008/01/10/63282.html
about the “Gang of Four” all endorsing Obama because of their all consuming hatred for Hillary and Bill Clinton.  It would seem to me that they would state some issue that Obama has as a reason for the endorsement to offset the REAL reason that I previously mentioned.  

This act of complete disregard for intelligent thought (what am I saying, I am talking about Kennedy, Bore, Kerry and Dean and I reference intelligence??) is possibly in all reality giving Hillary an indirect boost because there are many of those who have less than undying admiration for those who make up the “the gang of Four”.  

I can’t help but figure this was expected by Hillary’s people and should she be elected (oh my God, there I go again, must be something I ate) SHE will get HER revenge! Count on it!

Incidentally, “THe Gang of Four should really be called “The Useless Gang of Four”.

RWD

January 11, 2008 Posted by | 2008 Election, Al Gore, commentaries, Conservative, Democrat, election, Hillary, huckabee, Kerry, Liberal Democrat, Obama, Political, POLITICS, Presidential Candidate, Senator | , , , , , | Leave a comment