Right Wing Dog

The FIGHT for The RIGHT!

Murtha’s $31 Million in Earmarks – Could they be “Pay to Play”?

You will find a CBS report below on Earmarks by John Murtha and how they seem in the surface to be a little like Pay to Play. These of course are the earmarks that BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA said would not be allowed to flourish in his administration. Read the article and see if you possibly may come up with some questions in your own mind regarding Murtha’s Earmarks!

Spring in Washington is “earmark season” – a busy time for Congressman John Murtha.

“That’s my business,” Murtha said. “I’ve been in it for 35 years.”

As head of a powerful Defense committee, Murtha controls hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars, reports CBS News investigative correspondent Sharyl Attkisson. And he’s not shy about directing money to those who give generously to his election campaigns.

CBS News has learned that this month, Murtha is steering new earmarks toward 10 companies that recently donated to his campaign.

Murtha wants $8 million for Argon ST, a defense contractor whose CEO gave Murtha the maximum allowed by law – $2,400 by an individual. He’s directing a $5 million earmark toward Advanced Acoustic Concepts, which also gave the max – $5,000 for a political action committee – to his campaign. In all, 10 recent Murtha donors are slated to receive $31 million in Murtha earmarks for 2010.

Taxpayer watchdogs may not like how it looks, but it’s not against the law unless donations were required in order to receive the earmarks. Looking for evidence of wrongdoing, the FBI has recently raided offices of two other companies linked to Murtha.

“The sooner it gets to a bright line that’s a direct connection of ‘you give me money, you’re going to get taxpayer dollars,’ that’s when you really cross the line,” said Steve Ellis, with Taxpayers for Common Sense.

That line was crossed in one case, according to a defense contractor who spoke to us on condition of anonymity for fear of losing government contracts.

The contractor was set to receive $1 million tax dollars. He said the military told him the money would come through a company called Commonwealth Research Institute, whose parent company, Concurrent Technologies, ranked among the largest earmark recipients. Both were set up with Murtha’s help in his own hometown. The defense contractor said Commonwealth officials told him to get the money, he should “consider opening an office” in Johnstown, Murtha’s hometown, and chided his company for not giving “enough campaign contributions to Murtha,” and not making “a showing at Murtha’s annual defense contractor fair.”

The contractor told CBS News: “I wouldn’t do it. We’re just not going to play.” He didn’t get the funds.

“You called this a ‘shakedown?'” Attkisson asked Ellis.

“If you want the money then you’ve got to do these things, and that’s being shaken down,” Ellis said.

“Is there anything illegal about that?” Attkisson asked.

“It’s hard to tell until you have all the details,” Ellis said. “Illegality is a tricky thing on this. It’s very hard to prove a quid pro quo because most of these things aren’t written down.”

Commonwealth, subpoenaed in a separate federal probe, would only say it’s always encouraged companies to relocate to Johnstown, and attend Murtha’s fair to promote growth – but does “not encourage anyone to make campaign contributions.”

Murtha wouldn’t comment for our report. He did recently tell a home state newspaper that he’s only trying to bring home the bacon.

“If I’m corrupt,” said the congressman, “It’s because I take care of my district.”

RWD

Advertisements

April 22, 2009 - Posted by | Blogroll, corruption, Democrat, earmarks, Liberal Democrat, Murtha, Obama, Political, POLITICS | , ,

5 Comments »

  1. […] Original post by rightwingdog […]

    Pingback by Murtha’s $31 Million in Earmarks - Could they be “Pay to Play”? | April 22, 2009 | Reply

  2. Love this blog I’ll be back when I have more time.

    Comment by mrred | April 22, 2009 | Reply

  3. Please come back often!

    RWD

    Comment by RightWingDog | April 28, 2009 | Reply

  4. Hi, nice post. I have been pondering this topic,so thanks for sharing. I will likely be coming back to your site. Keep up great writing

    Comment by How I Was Able to Lose Thirty Póunds in Only a Month | May 6, 2009 | Reply

  5. Thank You for the comment and please come back (tell your friends as well).
    I call them as I see them.
    I am presently researching the claim that Murtha’s nephew received $4 Million in defense contracts last year on a “no bid basis”.

    Seems to me that this is one of the things the Democrats were always blasting GWB about and if true, why hasn’t Jack “loud mouth” Murtha been brought to task for his part in it? One thing I liked about Barack Hussein Obama’s campaign promises was that he pladged to do away with NO BID CONTRACTS! We will see as the jury is still out on that one!

    RWD

    Comment by RightWingDog | May 6, 2009 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: